1) The review process should be shorter than a
regular paper: The decision is based primarily on relevance and importance. Our
goal is to have one review round.
2) Each replication will be read by one of the corner
editors, who will decide if it should be sent to a reviewer (in some exceptions
two reviewers will be used). The corner editor might ask one of the authors of
the original paper to review the replication. The decision will be up or out
after this round.
3) In some cases, based on the judgment of the corner
editor, a short rejoinder might be invited.